Não foi possível enviar o arquivo. Será algum problema com as permissões?
Diferenças
Aqui você vê as diferenças entre duas revisões dessa página.
— |
seminarios:martin2018 [2018/11/26 20:41] (atual) paulojus criada |
||
---|---|---|---|
Linha 1: | Linha 1: | ||
+ | **Some Generalizations of Gneiting's Univariate and Bivariate Models** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Prof. Dr. Martin Schlather | ||
+ | Institut für Mathematik | ||
+ | Universität Mannheim | ||
+ | (joint work with Olga Moreva & NIklas Hansen) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Gaussian random fields are completely characterized by their mean and | ||
+ | their covariance function. In applications suitable classes | ||
+ | of parametrized covariance functions are needed. Whilst in the | ||
+ | univariate case a large number of classes is available, not that many | ||
+ | classes exist in the multivariate case. In this talk we mainly focus | ||
+ | on bivariate covariance functios that are generalizations or | ||
+ | modifications of models that have been suggested by Tilmann Gneiting. | ||
+ | In particular, the univariate cutoff embedding technique is transferred | ||
+ | to the | ||
+ | bivariate case. On that way, the results for the univariate case had | ||
+ | to improved. As examples for the bivariate cutoff technique, we consider | ||
+ | Gneiting's bivariate Matern model and modifications thereof. | ||
+ | Finally, we show that Gneiting's generalized Cauchy model can be | ||
+ | combined with the fractional Browian motion to get a parametric model | ||
+ | that covers both the stationary and the intrinsically stationary case. | ||
+ | |||